SecurityLab
independent auditor · senior DevOps engineer

Your smart contract is scanned before an attacker scans it.

Continuous automated security monitoring over newly deployed contracts across 9 EVM networks — Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Gnosis, zkSync Era, Scroll. Static analysis with Slither + Aderyn (100+ vulnerability detectors), every finding reviewed manually.

securitylab — live scan (illustrative)
56,900+
contracts scanned
100+
vulnerability detectors
9
networks · DEX exploits via PoC
24h
report delivery
2
languages: EN + RU
Audited across 9 EVM networks
Ethereum
BNB Chain
Polygon
Arbitrum
Base
Optimism
Gnosis
zkSync Era
Scroll
Payments accepted in
USDT
BTC
ETH
ETC
PIPELINE

How it works

From a new contract on-chain to a report in your hands — automated, with every finding cross-checked before anything critical goes out.

01

Monitor

Every new verified contract on Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base or Optimism is picked up within minutes of deployment.

02

Audit

Slither + Aderyn (100+ detectors each) cross-check every finding, with a heuristic engine as fallback.

03

Verify

⚡ mainnet fork replay

Where a Foundry fork-test template exists, the exploit is actually replayed on a mainnet fork. For other classes, Mythril's symbolic execution gives a concrete-counterexample cross-check.

04

Deliver

A free teaser with the severity breakdown goes out immediately. The full report unlocks for critical/high findings after payment.

COVERAGE

What we detect

Every contract is checked by two static-analysis engines plus targeted heuristics. Findings come with risk, exploit path and a fix — not just a CVE number. Classification rules are continuously refined against real deployed contracts to keep false positives down.

🔁

Reentrancy

ETH and ERC-20 re-entrancy in all variants — the bug class behind The DAO and hundreds of millions in losses.

🔐

Access control

Missing or wrong modifiers, unprotected initializers, functions that let anyone mint, pause or drain.

💸

Fund theft paths

Arbitrary ETH/ERC-20 sends, unchecked low-level calls, delegatecall to user-controlled addresses.

∑

Logic & math

Unchecked arithmetic, precision loss, unsafe casting, weak randomness from block variables.

🪙

Token pitfalls

ERC-20 approve race conditions, fee-on-transfer traps, honeypot-style transfer restrictions.

🛡

Hardening

Floating pragma, outdated compilers, tx.origin auth, selfdestruct and proxy upgrade risks.

PROOF

Real output, straight from the bot

This is what a project owner receives in Telegram minutes after their contract is deployed — summary, detailed findings, and the full report as a file.

S
Securitylab
bot
⋮
Audit summary in Telegram: XiaoQiangFactory, BSC, C:0 H:13 M:5 L:3 HIGH finding: weak PRNG, lines 234-246, with risk description MEDIUM finding: ERC-20 approve race, exploit path and fix Full report file attached plus monitoring stats Showcase PASS: BeatXswap oracle price manipulation, PancakeSwap V3, $63,704 profit reproduced on mainnet fork Showcase PASS: Yam Finance governance takeover, full DAO proposal-to-drain chain reproduced on mainnet fork Showcase PASS: Venus Protocol donation/borrow-behalf exploit reproduced on mainnet fork
  • 🔍Audit summary — name, address, compiler, network, engine, balance & tx count, vulnerability table.
  • 🟠Every finding explained twice — Risk in Russian and English, plus the exact exploit path and a fix.
  • 📄Full report as a file — audit_0xfbcff8f2…0547ac_2026….md — ready to forward to your devs or listing platforms.
  • 📊Monitoring built in — 56,884 contracts checked, every new deploy scanned automatically.
  • ⚡Minutes, not weeks — the report above was generated at contract deploy time: 2026-09-28 08:10 UTC.
OUTPUT

Sample finding — real audit output

This is the real bilingual EN/RU report format every customer receives — shown as-is, regardless of site language.

audit_0xfbcff8f2…0547ac.md
SMART CONTRACT AUDIT — BSC
Name / Имя:       XiaoQiangFactory
Address / Адрес:  0xfbcff8f2ba36ab8c7dbfa86091cc456c6f0547ac
Compiler:         v0.8.13+commit.abaa5c0e
Engine / Движок:  SLITHER + ADERYN
Summary / Сводка: C:0 · H:13 · M:5 · L:3

[HIGH] Predictable randomness — weak PRNG (block-based)
Lines: 234–246

⚠ Risk: randomness is built on block.timestamp / blockhash /
block.difficulty — values known in advance or steerable by the
miner/validator at block inclusion. Confirmed by a second engine
(Aderyn, detector: weak-randomness).

🎯 Exploit: the attacker (or a miner/validator) computes the outcome
of the 'random' draw before the transaction is mined, knowing the
contract parameters and the next block's data.

✅ Fix: use a verifiable random function (Chainlink VRF) or a
commit-reveal scheme; never block variables as entropy.

Real output from the monitoring system, 2026-09-28 08:10:58 UTC. Full report — 13 high findings with per-line references, exploit paths and fixes — delivered as a file in the bot.

PRICING

Pricing

Professional audit firms charge $1,000–15,000 per audit — this is the same detector class, human-reviewed.

Full audit report

$149

EN+RU report, exploitation steps, fixes, 24h delivery.

+ free re-check after fixes
Get started
MOST THOROUGH

Audit + fix consultation

$490

Full report + 1:1 walkthrough with your dev team.

Get started

Monitoring bot (white-label)

from $990

Your own branded audit bot + reports under your name.

Talk to us
Franchise / full system — source code, knowledge base, deployment, docs, 30 days support.
on request

💰 Pay with crypto

Send the invoice amount to the matching address below, then forward the transaction hash to @mkoldaev — the report unlocks right after manual on-chain confirmation, usually within the hour.

USDT · TRC20 network
TJGZNqwXoF23px6s5fqS8oE968BqnPtZVP
BTC
16Njhxam4WM3omzuq2zvY2VdhUS3UxoXDx
ETH · ERC20 network
0xd062f51e3b809d1a76616b66adea07706bf458e6
ETC
0xd062f51e3b809d1a76616b66adea07706bf458e6

⚠️ Match the network to the asset exactly — USDT must be sent as TRC20, not ERC20/BEP20. Wrong network means the funds cannot be recovered.

QUESTIONS

FAQ

Is this a real audit, or an LLM guessing?

No LLM in the audit pipeline. Every finding comes from Slither and Aderyn — two independent static-analysis engines, the same class of tooling professional audit firms use — cross-checked against each other, with a heuristic fallback when a contract won't compile under either. Where a fork-test template exists, the exploit is actually replayed on a mainnet fork instead of trusting a static label.

What does "PoC-CONFIRMED" actually mean?

The exploit was executed on a forked copy of mainnet at the real attack block and reproduced the same profit as the real incident — down to the wei, not a theoretical description. See the showcase slides above (BeatXswap, Yam Finance, Venus Protocol). Anything without that label is a static-analysis finding — real, but not independently replayed yet.

How do I pay with crypto?

Send the invoice amount to the USDT (TRC20), BTC, ETH or ETC address in the Pricing section, then send the transaction hash to @mkoldaev. Reports unlock after manual confirmation on-chain — usually within the hour.

What if my contract has no critical findings?

Low/medium-only reports are delivered in full for free — there's nothing to gate. Payment is only required to unlock the exact exploit path and fix for critical/high severity findings.

Found a bug before launch?

Send the contract address — get a summary of findings within minutes, full report within 24 hours.

Telegram — @mkoldaev