HIGHETH sent to an arbitrary, user-controlled address
HIGHReentrancy without ETH (state-only)
HIGHETH sent to an arbitrary, user-controlled address
MEDIUMReturn value of an external call ignored
MEDIUMCentralization risk (absolute admin powers)
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWReentrancy without state impact (benign)
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWAddress parameter not indexed in event
INFORMATIONALReentrancy detected via event emission order
INFORMATIONALReentrancy detected via event emission order
INFORMATIONALReentrancy detected via event emission order
INFORMATIONALReentrancy detected via event emission order
INFORMATIONALReentrancy detected via event emission order
INFORMATIONALReentrancy detected via event emission order
INFORMATIONALLow-level call usage
INFORMATIONALLow-level call usage
INFORMATIONALLow-level call usage
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALOutdated Solidity compiler
INFORMATIONALPUSH0 opcode (requires Shanghai EVM)
INFORMATIONALLarge numeric literal (hard to verify by eye)
Preview only — no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here
to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines,
exploit path and fork PoC — via the bot below.
If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate,
or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.
Auto-audit by SecurityLab (slither+aderyn). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed —
not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.