๐Ÿ” NRGNFT

๐Ÿ“ 0x97d7f62f50ec0fdd08fa9d2d8add92b28e70445d ยท ๐ŸŒ BSC ยท ๐Ÿค– engine: slither+aderyn
๐Ÿ’ฐ Balance: 0.0 ยท ๐Ÿ“ˆ Tx: 1

CRITICAL 0 HIGH 0 MEDIUM 2 LOW 4

Findings preview

MEDIUMAccess control issue (manual review required)
MEDIUMContract can receive ETH but has no withdrawal path
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWAccess control issue (manual review required)
LOWAccess control issue (manual review required)
INFORMATIONALLow-level call usage
INFORMATIONALLow-level call usage
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALLarge numeric literal (hard to verify by eye)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)

Preview only โ€” no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines, exploit path and fork PoC โ€” via the bot below.

๐Ÿ“ฉ Get full report via Telegram

View contract on block explorer โ†’

โš ๏ธ Think this finding is wrong?

If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate, or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.

๐Ÿ‘ค
โœ‰๏ธ
โœˆ๏ธ
๐ŸŒ
๐Ÿ’ฌ

Opens your email app, addressed to our team โ€” nothing is sent from this page directly.

Auto-audit by SecurityLab (slither+aderyn). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed โ€” not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.