CRITICALETH sent to an arbitrary, user-controlled address
CRITICALStorage pointer not initialized (points to slot 0)
CRITICALETH sent to an arbitrary, user-controlled address
HIGHETH sent to an arbitrary, user-controlled address
MEDIUMStrict equality on balances/tokens
MEDIUMStrict equality on balances/tokens
MEDIUMStrict equality on balances/tokens
MEDIUMContract can receive ETH but has no withdrawal path
MEDIUMContract should inherit an interface it claims to implement
MEDIUMContract should inherit an interface it claims to implement
MEDIUMContract should inherit an interface it claims to implement
MEDIUMContract should inherit an interface it claims to implement
MEDIUMAccess control issue (manual review required)
MEDIUMArithmetic issue (manual review required)
MEDIUMArithmetic issue (manual review required)
MEDIUMArithmetic issue (manual review required)
MEDIUMLow-level call return value not checked
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWUnimplemented function bodies
LOWUnimplemented function bodies
LOWAddress parameter not indexed in event
LOWAddress parameter not indexed in event
LOWAddress parameter not indexed in event
Preview only — no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here
to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines,
exploit path and fork PoC — via the bot below.
If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate,
or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.
Auto-audit by SecurityLab (slither+aderyn). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed —
not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.