HIGHETH sent to an arbitrary, user-controlled address
HIGHWeak randomness (block-based)
HIGHPotential reentrancy (manual review required)
MEDIUMStrict equality on balances/tokens
MEDIUMReturn value of an external call ignored
MEDIUMReturn value of an external call ignored
MEDIUMCentralization risk (absolute admin powers)
MEDIUMCentralization risk (absolute admin powers)
MEDIUMCentralization risk (absolute admin powers)
MEDIUMCentralization risk (absolute admin powers)
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
LOWMissing events on access-critical state changes
LOWReentrancy without state impact (benign)
LOWReentrancy without state impact (benign)
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWUnbounded loop over dynamic array
LOWUnbounded loop over dynamic array
LOWMissing zero-address check
INFORMATIONALReentrancy detected via event emission order
INFORMATIONALReentrancy detected via event emission order
INFORMATIONALInline assembly usage
INFORMATIONALHigh cyclomatic complexity
INFORMATIONALHigh cyclomatic complexity
INFORMATIONALUnreachable code
INFORMATIONALUnreachable code
INFORMATIONALUnreachable code
Preview only — no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here
to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines,
exploit path and fork PoC — via the bot below.
If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate,
or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.
Auto-audit by SecurityLab (slither+aderyn). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed —
not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.