๐Ÿ” AccountantWithRateProviders

๐Ÿ“ 0x585e091D3a9758ce512b375339a0799E7Be00cbe ยท ๐ŸŒ ETH ยท ๐Ÿค– engine: heuristic
๐Ÿ’ฐ Balance: 0.0 ยท ๐Ÿ“ˆ Tx: 0

CRITICAL 1 HIGH 0 MEDIUM 1 LOW 3

Findings preview

CRITICALReward accounting flaw (repeated claim / uncapped payout)
MEDIUMClassic ERC20 approve without increase/decreaseAllowance
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
INFORMATIONALDonation/inflation attack on vault (exchange rate manipulation)
INFORMATIONALCross-chain bridge exploit (forged message / delegate hijack)
INFORMATIONALToken mechanic incompatibility (deflationary/rebasing/fee-on-transfer)
INFORMATIONALVault share accounting flaw (index/component desync)
INFORMATIONALTransfer logic flaw (custom hook / fee-on-transfer desync)
INFORMATIONALDecimals/precision mismatch between tokens

Preview only โ€” no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines, exploit path and fork PoC โ€” via the bot below.

๐Ÿ“ฉ Get full report via Telegram

View contract on block explorer โ†’

โš ๏ธ Think this finding is wrong?

If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate, or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.

๐Ÿ‘ค
โœ‰๏ธ
โœˆ๏ธ
๐ŸŒ
๐Ÿ’ฌ

Opens your email app, addressed to our team โ€” nothing is sent from this page directly.

Auto-audit by SecurityLab (heuristic). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed โ€” not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.