📍 0x9003b72161870A49F2e12C9cC161527aea9133d7 · 🌐 ETH · 🤖 engine: slither+aderyn
💰 Balance: 0.0 · 📈 Tx: 6
CRITICAL 2HIGH 1MEDIUM 20LOW 8
Findings preview
CRITICALReentrancy in ETH withdrawal
CRITICALStorage pointer not initialized (points to slot 0)
HIGHReentrancy without ETH (state-only)
MEDIUMStrict equality on balances/tokens
MEDIUMStrict equality on balances/tokens
MEDIUMStrict equality on balances/tokens
MEDIUMReturn value of an external call ignored
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMExternal calls inside a loop
MEDIUMExternal calls inside a loop
MEDIUMExternal calls inside a loop
MEDIUMLow-level call return value not checked
MEDIUMLow-level call return value not checked
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWReentrancy without state impact (benign)
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWRedundant code
LOWMissing zero-address check
Preview only — no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here
to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines,
exploit path and fork PoC — via the bot below.
If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate,
or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.
Auto-audit by SecurityLab (slither+aderyn). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed —
not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.