📍 0x5f4811E122B4adbe2dC6F324e903483F813F4088 · 🌐 ETH · 🤖 engine: slither+aderyn
💰 Balance: 0.0 · 📈 Tx: 16
CRITICAL 0HIGH 2MEDIUM 13LOW 10
Findings preview
HIGHReentrancy without ETH (state-only)
HIGHecrecover without invalid-signature protection
MEDIUMStrict equality on balances/tokens
MEDIUMStrict equality on balances/tokens
MEDIUMLocal variable used before initialization
MEDIUMReturn value of an external call ignored
MEDIUMReturn value of an external call ignored
MEDIUMLow-level call return value not checked
MEDIUMLow-level call return value not checked
MEDIUMContract can receive ETH but has no withdrawal path
MEDIUMCentralization risk (absolute admin powers)
MEDIUMCentralization risk (absolute admin powers)
MEDIUMCentralization risk (absolute admin powers)
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
INFORMATIONALReentrancy detected via event emission order
INFORMATIONALHigh cyclomatic complexity
INFORMATIONALLow-level call usage
INFORMATIONALLow-level call usage
INFORMATIONALLow-level call usage
Preview only — no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here
to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines,
exploit path and fork PoC — via the bot below.
If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate,
or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.
Auto-audit by SecurityLab (slither+aderyn). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed —
not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.