🔍 EthUniswapPCVController

📍 0x0760dfE09Bd6d04D0Df9a60C51f01ecedCEb5132 · 🌐 ETH · 🤖 engine: heuristic

💰 Balance: 0.0 · 📈 Tx: 0

CRITICAL 5 HIGH 1 MEDIUM 3 LOW 5

Findings preview

CRITICALReentrancy with ETH withdrawal (repeated entry)

CRITICALdelegatecall to a caller-controlled address

CRITICALAMM pair reserve manipulation (privileged burn / sync)

HIGHInsufficient input validation (arbitrary address/param)

MEDIUMOutdated Solidity compiler version

MEDIUMClassic ERC20 approve without increase/decreaseAllowance

MEDIUMOracle price manipulation (spot/TWAP/stale)

LOWFloating compiler version (^ or >=)

LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp

INFORMATIONALSensitive function without explicit access control

INFORMATIONALSignature replay (missing nonce/cleanup)

INFORMATIONALCross-chain bridge exploit (forged message / delegate hijack)

INFORMATIONALToken mechanic incompatibility (deflationary/rebasing/fee-on-transfer)

INFORMATIONALAuthorization bypass via multicall/batch (self-referential call)

INFORMATIONALSmart account vulnerability (ERC-4337/7579 init/signature)

INFORMATIONALTransfer logic flaw (custom hook / fee-on-transfer desync)

INFORMATIONALDecimals/precision mismatch between tokens

Preview only — no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines, exploit path and fork PoC — via the bot below.

📩 Get full report via Telegram

View contract on block explorer →

⚠️ Think this finding is wrong?

If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate, or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.

Auto-audit by SecurityLab (heuristic). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed — not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.