๐Ÿ” FaastSweeper

๐Ÿ“ 0x051e7D9983339e9aBCFbd5D9EB8fb329675B2F30 ยท ๐ŸŒ ETH ยท ๐Ÿค– engine: slither+aderyn
๐Ÿ’ฐ Balance: 0.0 ยท ๐Ÿ“ˆ Tx: 1

CRITICAL 0 HIGH 0 MEDIUM 3 LOW 2

Findings preview

MEDIUMIncorrect ERC20 interface
MEDIUMCentralization risk (absolute admin powers)
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
LOWAccess control issue (manual review required)
LOWEmpty code block
INFORMATIONALReentrancy detected via event emission order
INFORMATIONALOutdated Solidity compiler
INFORMATIONALOutdated Solidity compiler
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)

Preview only โ€” no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines, exploit path and fork PoC โ€” via the bot below.

๐Ÿ“ฉ Get full report via Telegram

View contract on block explorer โ†’

โš ๏ธ Think this finding is wrong?

If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate, or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.

๐Ÿ‘ค
โœ‰๏ธ
โœˆ๏ธ
๐ŸŒ
๐Ÿ’ฌ

Opens your email app, addressed to our team โ€” nothing is sent from this page directly.

Auto-audit by SecurityLab (slither+aderyn). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed โ€” not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.