📍 0xD1b74e4Bcf576B7BDe4B90d150AB00683f7d7c93 · 🌐 ETH · 🤖 engine: slither+aderyn
💰 Balance: 0.0 · 📈 Tx: 0
CRITICAL 1HIGH 1MEDIUM 10LOW 10
Findings preview
CRITICALArbitrary transferFrom of third-party ERC20 tokens
HIGHReentrancy without ETH (state-only)
MEDIUMStrict equality on balances/tokens
MEDIUMStrict equality on balances/tokens
MEDIUMStrict equality on balances/tokens
MEDIUMStrict equality on balances/tokens
MEDIUMStrict equality on balances/tokens
MEDIUMContract should inherit an interface it claims to implement
MEDIUMArithmetic issue (manual review required)
MEDIUMLow-level call return value not checked
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
INFORMATIONALReentrancy detected via event emission order
INFORMATIONALUnreachable code
INFORMATIONALOutdated Solidity compiler
INFORMATIONALPUSH0 opcode (requires Shanghai EVM)
INFORMATIONALPUSH0 opcode (requires Shanghai EVM)
INFORMATIONALLarge numeric literal (hard to verify by eye)
INFORMATIONALLarge numeric literal (hard to verify by eye)
INFORMATIONALLarge numeric literal (hard to verify by eye)
Preview only — no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here
to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines,
exploit path and fork PoC — via the bot below.
If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate,
or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.
Auto-audit by SecurityLab (slither+aderyn). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed —
not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.