📍 0x5cE4c601362d19b4Ea0928fEb0A17C77e7A41A0D · 🌐 ETH · 🤖 engine: slither+aderyn
💰 Balance: 0.0 · 📈 Tx: 0
CRITICAL 1HIGH 2MEDIUM 4LOW 4
Findings preview
CRITICALStorage pointer not initialized (points to slot 0)
HIGHArbitrary transferFrom of third-party ERC20 tokens
HIGHArbitrary transferFrom of third-party ERC20 tokens
MEDIUMExternal calls inside a loop
MEDIUMExternal calls inside a loop
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
LOWUnimplemented function bodies
LOWAccess control issue (manual review required)
LOWAccess control issue (manual review required)
LOWAccess control issue (manual review required)
INFORMATIONALFloating pragma
INFORMATIONALUnreachable code
INFORMATIONALUnreachable code
INFORMATIONALUnreachable code
INFORMATIONALUnreachable code
INFORMATIONALOutdated Solidity compiler
INFORMATIONALOutdated Solidity compiler
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALPUSH0 opcode (requires Shanghai EVM)
INFORMATIONALPUSH0 opcode (requires Shanghai EVM)
INFORMATIONALInconsistent type naming
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
Preview only — no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here
to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines,
exploit path and fork PoC — via the bot below.
If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate,
or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.
Auto-audit by SecurityLab (slither+aderyn). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed —
not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.