๐Ÿ” hexpool

๐Ÿ“ 0xAF5b8e12919207BdE4cF911d50633d039D8714ac ยท ๐ŸŒ ETH ยท ๐Ÿค– engine: slither
๐Ÿ’ฐ Balance: 0.0 ยท ๐Ÿ“ˆ Tx: 52

CRITICAL 0 HIGH 2 MEDIUM 5 LOW 3

Findings preview

HIGHArbitrary transferFrom of third-party ERC20 tokens
HIGHArbitrary transferFrom of third-party ERC20 tokens
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
MEDIUMExternal calls inside a loop
MEDIUMExternal calls inside a loop
MEDIUMExternal calls inside a loop
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWAddress parameter not indexed in event
LOWAddress parameter not indexed in event
INFORMATIONALOutdated Solidity compiler
INFORMATIONALOutdated Solidity compiler
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
OPTIMIZATIONState variables that could be constant

Preview only โ€” no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines, exploit path and fork PoC โ€” via the bot below.

๐Ÿ“ฉ Get full report via Telegram

View contract on block explorer โ†’

โš ๏ธ Think this finding is wrong?

If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate, or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.

๐Ÿ‘ค
โœ‰๏ธ
โœˆ๏ธ
๐ŸŒ
๐Ÿ’ฌ

Opens your email app, addressed to our team โ€” nothing is sent from this page directly.

Auto-audit by SecurityLab (slither). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed โ€” not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.