📍 0x0d131E15Cc3E1EAB7dC5Bf570E4E5865bf240eB5 · 🌐 ETH · 🤖 engine: slither+aderyn
💰 Balance: 0.0 · 📈 Tx: 264
CRITICAL 1HIGH 1MEDIUM 9LOW 6
Findings preview
CRITICALdelegatecall to a user-controlled address
HIGHModifier body does not execute `_`
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMContract can receive ETH but has no withdrawal path
MEDIUMContract can receive ETH but has no withdrawal path
MEDIUMContract can receive ETH but has no withdrawal path
MEDIUMContract can receive ETH but has no withdrawal path
MEDIUMContract can receive ETH but has no withdrawal path
MEDIUMContract can receive ETH but has no withdrawal path
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWAddress parameter not indexed in event
LOWAccess control issue (manual review required)
LOWAccess control issue (manual review required)
LOWEmpty code block
INFORMATIONALInline assembly usage
INFORMATIONALInline assembly usage
INFORMATIONALInline assembly usage
INFORMATIONALInline assembly usage
INFORMATIONALInline assembly usage
INFORMATIONALInline assembly usage
INFORMATIONALOutdated Solidity compiler
INFORMATIONALOutdated Solidity compiler
INFORMATIONALLow-level call usage
INFORMATIONALLow-level call usage
INFORMATIONALGas optimization / DoS pattern (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
Preview only — no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here
to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines,
exploit path and fork PoC — via the bot below.
If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate,
or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.
Auto-audit by SecurityLab (slither+aderyn). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed —
not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.