🔍 RoutrEnclaveRegistry

📍 0x164F180c6992837220c6F3336c6d705f8cBADcbA · 🌐 ETH · 🤖 engine: slither+aderyn
💰 Balance: 0.0 · 📈 Tx: 0

CRITICAL 1 HIGH 0 MEDIUM 5 LOW 8

Findings preview

CRITICALStorage pointer not initialized (points to slot 0)
MEDIUMLocal variable used before initialization
MEDIUMLocal variable used before initialization
MEDIUMLocal variable used before initialization
MEDIUMExternal calls inside a loop
MEDIUMContract should inherit an interface it claims to implement
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWUnbounded loop over dynamic array
LOWUnbounded loop over dynamic array
LOWUnbounded loop over dynamic array
LOWUnbounded loop over dynamic array
LOWAddress parameter not indexed in event
INFORMATIONALOutdated Solidity compiler
INFORMATIONALPUSH0 opcode (requires Shanghai EVM)
INFORMATIONALPUSH0 opcode (requires Shanghai EVM)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)

Preview only — no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines, exploit path and fork PoC — via the bot below.

📩 Get full report via Telegram

View contract on block explorer →

⚠️ Think this finding is wrong?

If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate, or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.

👤
✉️
✈️
🌐
💬

Opens your email app, addressed to our team — nothing is sent from this page directly.

Auto-audit by SecurityLab (slither+aderyn). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed — not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.