📍 0x1599470505eC590a2aa85Ef8d7DFED7833a60831 · 🌐 ETH · 🤖 engine: slither+aderyn
💰 Balance: 0.0 · 📈 Tx: 0
CRITICAL 1HIGH 1MEDIUM 2LOW 10
Findings preview
CRITICALETH sent to an arbitrary, user-controlled address
HIGHdelete on a struct containing a mapping
MEDIUMReturn value of an external call ignored
MEDIUMContract can receive ETH but has no withdrawal path
LOWComparing booleans to true/false literals
LOWComparing booleans to true/false literals
LOWComparing booleans to true/false literals
LOWComparing booleans to true/false literals
LOWComparing booleans to true/false literals
LOWComparing booleans to true/false literals
LOWComparing booleans to true/false literals
LOWComparing booleans to true/false literals
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWAccess control issue (manual review required)
INFORMATIONALOutdated Solidity compiler
INFORMATIONALOutdated Solidity compiler
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALBoolean constant comparison
INFORMATIONALBoolean constant comparison
INFORMATIONALBoolean constant comparison
INFORMATIONALBoolean constant comparison
INFORMATIONALBoolean constant comparison
INFORMATIONALBoolean constant comparison
Preview only — no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here
to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines,
exploit path and fork PoC — via the bot below.
If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate,
or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.
Auto-audit by SecurityLab (slither+aderyn). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed —
not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.