📍 0xD91C5e039Fa7815Db709E5e2A4279471a7b7148F · 🌐 ETH · 🤖 engine: slither+aderyn
💰 Balance: 0.0 · 📈 Tx: 0
CRITICAL 3HIGH 0MEDIUM 7LOW 1
Findings preview
CRITICALStorage pointer not initialized (points to slot 0)
CRITICALETH sent to an arbitrary, user-controlled address
CRITICALETH sent to an arbitrary, user-controlled address
MEDIUMrequire() that is always true or always false
MEDIUMLocal variable used before initialization
MEDIUMAccess control issue (manual review required)
MEDIUMLow-level call return value not checked
MEDIUMLow-level call return value not checked
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
LOWTautological comparison (x == x / x < x)
INFORMATIONALInline assembly usage
INFORMATIONALInline assembly usage
INFORMATIONALUnreachable code
INFORMATIONALUnreachable code
INFORMATIONALUnreachable code
INFORMATIONALUnreachable code
INFORMATIONALUnreachable code
INFORMATIONALUnreachable code
INFORMATIONALUnreachable code
INFORMATIONALUnreachable code
INFORMATIONALOutdated Solidity compiler
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALPUSH0 opcode (requires Shanghai EVM)
INFORMATIONALInconsistent type naming
INFORMATIONALInconsistent type naming
INFORMATIONALInconsistent type naming
Preview only — no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here
to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines,
exploit path and fork PoC — via the bot below.
If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate,
or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.
Auto-audit by SecurityLab (slither+aderyn). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed —
not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.