๐Ÿ” YieldVault

๐Ÿ“ 0xFB0c70eaDdc3717A9c95E3D6c5B791244437a25c ยท ๐ŸŒ ETH ยท ๐Ÿค– engine: heuristic
๐Ÿ’ฐ Balance: 0.0 ยท ๐Ÿ“ˆ Tx: 7

CRITICAL 2 HIGH 1 MEDIUM 1 LOW 9

Findings preview

CRITICALAMM pair reserve manipulation (privileged burn / sync)
CRITICALVault share accounting flaw (index/component desync)
HIGHDecimals/precision mismatch between tokens
MEDIUMClassic ERC20 approve without increase/decreaseAllowance
LOWFloating compiler version (^ or >=)
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
INFORMATIONALRepeatable claim (missing claimed-flag)
INFORMATIONALReward accounting flaw (repeated claim / uncapped payout)

Preview only โ€” no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines, exploit path and fork PoC โ€” via the bot below.

๐Ÿ“ฉ Get full report via Telegram

View contract on block explorer โ†’

โš ๏ธ Think this finding is wrong?

If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate, or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.

๐Ÿ‘ค
โœ‰๏ธ
โœˆ๏ธ
๐ŸŒ
๐Ÿ’ฌ

Opens your email app, addressed to our team โ€” nothing is sent from this page directly.

Auto-audit by SecurityLab (heuristic). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed โ€” not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.