CRITICALStorage pointer not initialized (points to slot 0)
HIGHETH sent to an arbitrary, user-controlled address
HIGHUser-controlled array length
HIGHDirect array.length assignment (resize)
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMLocal variable shadows a state variable
MEDIUMContract can receive ETH but has no withdrawal path
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
MEDIUMtransfer()/transferFrom() return value not checked
LOWMissing events on math-parameter changes
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWReentrancy without state impact (benign)
LOWReentrancy without state impact (benign)
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWblock.timestamp dependence
LOWUnbounded loop over dynamic array
Preview only — no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here
to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines,
exploit path and fork PoC — via the bot below.
If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate,
or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.
Auto-audit by SecurityLab (slither+aderyn). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed —
not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.