🔍 LiquidityReward_1

📍 0x62e5AF518Bd19235932d275f108Ed57B214baD91 · 🌐 OPTIMISM · 🤖 engine: heuristic
💰 Balance: 0.0 · 📈 Tx: 0

CRITICAL 1 HIGH 2 MEDIUM 1 LOW 9

Findings preview

CRITICALOracle price manipulation (spot/TWAP/stale)
HIGHSolidity < 0.8 without SafeMath
HIGHInsufficient input validation (arbitrary address/param)
MEDIUMClassic ERC20 approve without increase/decreaseAllowance
LOWFloating compiler version (^ or >=)
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
INFORMATIONALSensitive function without explicit access control
INFORMATIONALReward accounting flaw (repeated claim / uncapped payout)
INFORMATIONALDecimals/precision mismatch between tokens

Preview only — no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines, exploit path and fork PoC — via the bot below.

📩 Get full report via Telegram

View contract on block explorer →

⚠️ Think this finding is wrong?

If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate, or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.

👤
✉️
✈️
🌐
💬

Opens your email app, addressed to our team — nothing is sent from this page directly.

Auto-audit by SecurityLab (heuristic). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed — not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.