🔍 Pair

📍 0x9BE8A6Ca3019783062Ef68c65c7B4bEf087b227e · 🌐 OPTIMISM · 🤖 engine: heuristic
💰 Balance: 0.0 · 📈 Tx: 7

CRITICAL 2 HIGH 1 MEDIUM 3 LOW 5

Findings preview

CRITICALOracle price manipulation (spot/TWAP/stale)
CRITICALAMM pair reserve manipulation (privileged burn / sync)
HIGHDecimals/precision mismatch between tokens
MEDIUMunchecked block — arithmetic without overflow protection
MEDIUMClassic ERC20 approve without increase/decreaseAllowance
MEDIUMSignature replay (missing nonce/cleanup)
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
LOWLogic depends on block.timestamp
INFORMATIONALSensitive function without explicit access control
INFORMATIONALSensitive function without explicit access control
INFORMATIONALFlash loan amplified attack
INFORMATIONALRepeatable claim (missing claimed-flag)
INFORMATIONALReward accounting flaw (repeated claim / uncapped payout)
INFORMATIONALTransfer logic flaw (custom hook / fee-on-transfer desync)

Preview only — no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines, exploit path and fork PoC — via the bot below.

📩 Get full report via Telegram

View contract on block explorer →

⚠️ Think this finding is wrong?

If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate, or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.

👤
✉️
✈️
🌐
💬

Opens your email app, addressed to our team — nothing is sent from this page directly.

Auto-audit by SecurityLab (heuristic). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed — not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.