๐Ÿ” PasexClone

๐Ÿ“ 0xCd4eA8BD757F8e431923AE64B7cE98bCb7d08392 ยท ๐ŸŒ OPTIMISM ยท ๐Ÿค– engine: slither+aderyn
๐Ÿ’ฐ Balance: 0.0 ยท ๐Ÿ“ˆ Tx: 2395

CRITICAL 0 HIGH 0 MEDIUM 1 LOW 3

Findings preview

MEDIUMContract should inherit an interface it claims to implement
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWMissing zero-address check
LOWAccess control issue (manual review required)
INFORMATIONALOutdated Solidity compiler
INFORMATIONALLow-level call usage
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALNaming convention violation
INFORMATIONALPUSH0 opcode (requires Shanghai EVM)
INFORMATIONALLarge numeric literal (hard to verify by eye)
OPTIMIZATIONState variables that could be constant
OPTIMIZATIONState variables that could be constant
OPTIMIZATIONState variables that could be constant
OPTIMIZATIONState variables that could be immutable
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)
OPTIMIZATIONAccess control issue (manual review required)

Preview only โ€” no exploit details or fix recommendations are published here to avoid disclosing an unpatched issue before the contract owner sees it. Full report (RU+EN), exact lines, exploit path and fork PoC โ€” via the bot below.

๐Ÿ“ฉ Get full report via Telegram

View contract on block explorer โ†’

โš ๏ธ Think this finding is wrong?

If you're the contract owner and believe this automated finding is inaccurate, or want this page reviewed or removed, send us your contact details and we'll get back to you.

๐Ÿ‘ค
โœ‰๏ธ
โœˆ๏ธ
๐ŸŒ
๐Ÿ’ฌ

Opens your email app, addressed to our team โ€” nothing is sent from this page directly.

Auto-audit by SecurityLab (slither+aderyn). Static analysis only unless noted as PoC-confirmed โ€” not a substitute for a manual audit before mainnet deployment with real funds.